Does Qwen 3.5 live up to the hype?
I tested 9 local LLMs on a Claude Code skill I actually use every day. Not a coding benchmark. A real multi-step agentic task described in natural language a...
Tap a slide to expand
I tested 9 local LLMs on a Claude Code skill I actually use every day. Not a coding benchmark. A real multi-step agentic task described in natural language as a markdown file.
My /linkedin-cover-image skill works like this:
- Read a LinkedIn post file and analyze the content
- Decide if it is a post or article and choose the correct dimension
- Pick the right layout template (quote, listicle, contrast)
- Write a complete HTML cover image - typography, colors, spacing, decorative elements
- Screenshot it to PNG
One command. No hand-holding. The model handles the entire workflow.
Same post. Same skill. One shot each. All results in the images.
—
Out of 9 models (5 usable / 2 issues / 2 failed):
Usable:
- GLM 4.7 Flash - Best. Highlighted both contrast keywords (“demo” and “DevOps”). Clean output.
- Qwen 3 VL (32B) - Nice layout, clean. Only highlighted “DevOps”, missed the contrast on “demo”.
- Qwen 3 VL (30B) - Similar to 32B. Clean but missed the “demo” highlight.
- GPT-OSS (20B) - Usable but not as polished.
- Qwen 3 (30B) - Clean output though arguably highlighted the wrong keyword.
Issues:
- Qwen 3.5 (35B) - Got the content right but the layout of the last sentence is off.
- Qwen 3 Coder (30B) - Long winded, highlighted the same wrong keyword as Qwen 3, and created an article cover instead of a post cover. Needed a follow-up prompt.
Failed:
- Devstral Small 2 - Kept saying “I will create the HTML cover” then produced nothing.
- Magistral 24B - Same. Repeated the loop and never wrote a file. (See screenshot)
—
Last image is Opus 4.6 for comparison. Network graph decorations, gradient effects, clean text hierarchy. The gap is still visible but GLM 4.7 Flash got closer than I expected.
Everyone benchmarks local LLMs on some standard benchmark. I do it on a real daily use case.
Multi-step agentic workflows where the model reads context, makes real world decisions, and writes a complete file - that is where you see the real gap.
GLM 4.7 Flash probably got the closest I have seen from any local model. I think it is usable for some tasks now.
#AI #ClaudeCode #LocalLLM
Enjoyed this? Subscribe for more.
Practical insights on AI, growth, and independent learning. No spam.
More in AI Agents
Gemini CLI stubbornly insisted its code was right and even did a Google search to prove it with an outdated article.
I was speechless. 😂
Vibe coding has been around longer than we think...
I once asked a developer to explain his code when it broke due to edge cases. He told me he didn't know because he copied it from Google. At least he was hon...
Business+AI Lab with AWS: Event Recap
Held at AWS Singapore, this hands-on GenAI Lab gave participants the rare opportunity to build and deploy their own enterprise-grade chatbot, in under 3 hour...
Claude Code vs Codex vs Gemini CLI vs Qwen: My Results
The winner is still Claude Code...
Does AI have empathy? I asked Claude a simple product question.
The answer surprised me.
What’s the most common hallucination you've seen from an LLM?
For me, it’s when you ask, “How do I do X in Y app or software?”
Gemini CLI stubbornly insisted its code was right and even did a Google search to prove it with an outdated article.
I was speechless. 😂
Business+AI Lab with AWS: Event Recap
Held at AWS Singapore, this hands-on GenAI Lab gave participants the rare opportunity to build and deploy their own enterprise-grade chatbot, in under 3 hour...
Does AI have empathy? I asked Claude a simple product question.
The answer surprised me.
Vibe coding has been around longer than we think...
I once asked a developer to explain his code when it broke due to edge cases. He told me he didn't know because he copied it from Google. At least he was hon...
Claude Code vs Codex vs Gemini CLI vs Qwen: My Results
The winner is still Claude Code...
What’s the most common hallucination you've seen from an LLM?
For me, it’s when you ask, “How do I do X in Y app or software?”