We were promised autonomous AI agents. But got Workflow Automation 2.0 instead.
2025: The Year of AI Agents š
2025: The Year of AI Agents š 2026: The Year of Workflow Automation 2.0 š
In early 2025, I was buzzing with excitement.
I built workflows in n8n that could do prospect research and send personalized emails as if they were from me. I saw the possibility of automating entire knowledge jobs with AI agents.
ā2025 is the year of AI agentsā, I believed it. With a 200k to 1m token context window, models can process 500+ to 2500+ pages of text. More than enough to give them any complex instruction to follow.
Fast forward to 2026. After using Claude Code with Opus 4.5 (one of the best models available) heavily for a few months, Iāve since lowered my expectations.
At 80k token context, we got poor instruction-following, hallucinations, Claude Code telling me a task is completed when it clearly isnāt.
Hereās what Iāve learned:
What DOESNāT work: Giving AI a detailed plan and a long-running task, then expecting it to finish reliably.
What ACTUALLY works:
- Break tasks into VERY SMALL sub-tasks
- Create specialized skills for how to DO each task
- Create specialized skills for how to REVIEW each task
- Create master skills with a step-by-step workflow that spawn agents to repeat do + review cycles
Each skill? Best kept within 40k tokens.
That doesnāt sound like autonomous AI agents as promised. It increasingly feels like Iām doing workflow automation 2.0.
So whatās the difference?
Workflow Automation 1.0: ā Steps drawn as flowcharts ā Code written to process data at each node ā Structured input required ā Deterministic output guaranteed
Workflow Automation 2.0: ā Steps written in natural language, as skills ā Data processing described in natural language, as skills ā Input can be less structured ā Output is non-deterministic
Weāre trading determinism and accuracy for robustness and flexibility.
Thatās the real state of AI right now.
Donāt get me wrong. Workflow Automation 2.0 is still very useful. Itās just that it is a far cry from āintelligenceā as claimed.
I think weāve hit the ceiling of what LLMs can do.
I am looking forward to the next release of frontier models to prove me wrong.
What do you think? Are we in the age of AI agents, or just workflow automation 2.0?
Enjoyed this? Subscribe for more.
Practical insights on AI, growth, and independent learning. No spam.
More in AI Agents
I finally concede that AI is smarter than me.
For 2 years, I held onto reasons like āAI can't solve my kid's homeworkā or āIt can't play tic-tac-toeā to believe I was still smarter.
Announcing my new book proposal:
š Working Effectively with Vibed Code
I will be speaking about RIP CMS: How AI agents like OpenClaw could transform the way we create and...
See you guys there if you manage to get a ticket.
AI Coding Assistants Have a Security Blind Spot
A few months ago, I wrote about a non-technical founder whose SaaS got exploited right after he publicly showed his build process using Cursor (https://lnkd....
Hot Take: Vibe Coding Won't Replace Software Engineers
Here, I share my journey from a strong believer to a skeptic.
What Publishers Think About AI Image Generation
I couldnāt find the original source of the memeāhappy to credit the author if anyone knows the source.
I finally concede that AI is smarter than me.
For 2 years, I held onto reasons like āAI can't solve my kid's homeworkā or āIt can't play tic-tac-toeā to believe I was still smarter.
I will be speaking about RIP CMS: How AI agents like OpenClaw could transform the way we create and...
See you guys there if you manage to get a ticket.
Hot Take: Vibe Coding Won't Replace Software Engineers
Here, I share my journey from a strong believer to a skeptic.
Announcing my new book proposal:
š Working Effectively with Vibed Code
AI Coding Assistants Have a Security Blind Spot
A few months ago, I wrote about a non-technical founder whose SaaS got exploited right after he publicly showed his build process using Cursor (https://lnkd....
What Publishers Think About AI Image Generation
I couldnāt find the original source of the memeāhappy to credit the author if anyone knows the source.