Most AI readiness tests skip the one layer that decides whether AI sticks: your people.
They go straight to data and process readiness. Important, yes. But I have watched plenty of transformations stall long before data or process ever became th...
They go straight to data and process readiness. Important, yes. But I have watched plenty of transformations stall long before data or process ever became the problem.
I wrote about this after a conversation with Shang How Tan, CEO of Sequoia Group. Most failed AI rollouts are technically sound. What is missing is acceptance from the people meant to use them. He framed it as Q × A = E. Quality of solution times Acceptance by people equals Effectiveness. High Q, low A, and you still get low E.
Read the earlier article: https://lnkd.in/gF2zrc9R
Here is what I keep hearing on the ground.
When I talk to CEOs and business leaders, the two problems that surface are rarely about tech:
- Fear
Their employees resist AI because they worry they will be replaced the moment they prove it works.
- Expectation
The ones who do try it are not impressed with the output, so they fall back to the old way. They expected AI to be plug and play. It is not. Out of the box it gives you average output, and most give up before they teach it their standards.
I wrote about why AI is not plug and play here: https://lnkd.in/gUXb2QGU
When I talk to working professionals, I hear a different two:
- Alignment
“My boss told us to use AI but never gave us a paid subscription.”
- Shadow AI
“So we use our own personal accounts. The company has no idea what data we are feeding into it.”
All four are addressable. But only if you surface them first. Most readiness tests never look here. So I built one that does.
It is free, takes about 5 minutes, and has 12 questions. By the end you will have a clearer picture of where your team stands.
Fun fact on the loud neo-brutalism look. Claude Code gave me 5 design options and most felt boring to me. In the past, redesigns and coding were expensive, so I always took the safe choice. Now that both are cheap, I asked myself, why not try something risky? I am not sure I made the right call. Tell me if you would have gone safer.
Check it out: https://lnkd.in/ga986aZi
If you are leading an AI push and it is not landing, the bottleneck is probably not your data. It is one of these four. Worth knowing which one.
Need help pushing AI adoption in your team? DM me.
#AI #AIAdoption #AIReadiness #ChangeManagement #FutureOfWork
Enjoyed this? Subscribe for more.
Practical insights on AI, growth, and independent learning. No spam.
More in Vibe Coding
Create a Free LinkedIn Carousel with Vibe Coding
(See the carousel below that I created for one of my posts)
Ten more websites went live this week from my Foundations of Claude Code workshop.
Check out what they built and vote for your favourite in the comments to help them win a portable monitor.
One of the most common copywriting mistakes junior marketers make:
Selling features, not benefits.
What Publishers Think About AI Image Generation
I couldn’t find the original source of the meme—happy to credit the author if anyone knows the source.
UX/UI and naming matter more than capability for adoption.
Recently, everyone on LinkedIn is talking about learning Claude after the demo of Claude Cowork.
Opus 4.5 refused to work OT recently. So I interviewed 7 free candidates.
Claude Code with Opus 4.5 has been my most productive team member for the past 3 months.
Create a Free LinkedIn Carousel with Vibe Coding
(See the carousel below that I created for one of my posts)
One of the most common copywriting mistakes junior marketers make:
Selling features, not benefits.
UX/UI and naming matter more than capability for adoption.
Recently, everyone on LinkedIn is talking about learning Claude after the demo of Claude Cowork.
Ten more websites went live this week from my Foundations of Claude Code workshop.
Check out what they built and vote for your favourite in the comments to help them win a portable monitor.
What Publishers Think About AI Image Generation
I couldn’t find the original source of the meme—happy to credit the author if anyone knows the source.
Opus 4.5 refused to work OT recently. So I interviewed 7 free candidates.
Claude Code with Opus 4.5 has been my most productive team member for the past 3 months.