Last Friday, I ran the Foundations of Claude workshop for Sequoia Group, a leadership and OD...
As Sequoians, they believe in going high tech so that they can go high touch. They have been using AI, but they would like to learn how to use it better.
As Sequoians, they believe in going high tech so that they can go high touch. They have been using AI, but they would like to learn how to use it better.
We covered 3 things. Here is the summary.
—
- The features that make Claude more than a chatbot
Most people use Claude (or ChatGPT) like a search engine that talks. One question, one answer, copy, paste. That barely scratches what it can do.
The features that matter most for knowledge work:
→ Projects: a workspace that holds your context, files, and instructions, so you stop re-explaining yourself every chat.
→ Artifacts: real deliverables built in a side window. Documents, slides, web pages, even small interactive apps.
→ Research: runs many searches that build on each other, then writes a cited report in minutes.
→ Connectors: plug in Gmail, Drive, or Notion. Claude reads your live data and, with your permission, acts on it.
→ Skills: teach Claude to do a recurring task your way, once, and it repeats it on demand.
—
- Three mental models for working with AI
→ A brilliant super-intern, with a drinking problem and short-term memory. Fast and capable, but it hallucinates (trust but verify), cannot take responsibility (you do), and forgets everything between chats. (adapted from Prof Simon Chesterman)
→ AI is an averaging machine. It was trained on everyone’s output, so by default it gives you average. Your taste, standards, and feedback are what shift it toward great.
→ You apprentice it. Out of the box it knows nothing about your business, your customers, or your voice. You teach it context and skills over time until it becomes uniquely yours.
—
- Context management. The part that matters most.
This is the single biggest lever on output quality, and the most overlooked.
-
LLMs have no memory. Every message is a fresh start. A chat only feels continuous because the whole conversation gets re-sent each turn.
-
Context is everything Claude can see: your prompt, your files, a project’s knowledge, your connected tools.
-
More is not better. Too much irrelevant context makes Claude follow instructions worse, not better. Keep it tight.
-
One chat, one topic. Switch topics and old context bleeds in. Start a new chat.
-
Durable context needs a home. Anything Claude should always know goes in your Instructions or a Project, not buried in one chat you will never find again.
Get context right, and the same model gives you better work.
—
If you lead a team adopting AI but getting generic, inconsistent results, that is usually not a model problem. It is a context problem, and it is teachable.
I run Foundations of Claude as a private session for teams. DM me to arrange one for your team.
#AI #ClaudeAI #FutureOfWork CC: Shang How, Jacqueline, Angela, Druga, Daniel, Zafirah, Shubaashini, Regina
Tap to expand
Enjoyed this? Subscribe for more.
Practical insights on AI, growth, and independent learning. No spam.
More in AI Agents
Claude Code is for software developers, and OpenClaw is more for business users.
A learner said this to another learner during a recent workshop. I think this is the most common and most dangerous misconception about these two tools.
Advanced Tip: How to use Git history to improve AI agent skills
Building AI agent skills is the highest-value thing to learn with AI agents right now. Skills are what make an AI agent do your work, your way, instead of th...
I spent years looking for one book that lists the exhaustive set of science concepts applied in...
AI agent + skill is commoditizing (or democratizing for a better word) knowledge at a faster pace than many realized.
Claude Code can code nice UI. But nice UI doesn't mean good UI.
Manual UI testing is becoming one of my biggest bottlenecks when coding with AI now.
Gemini CLI stubbornly insisted its code was right and even did a Google search to prove it with an outdated article.
I was speechless. 😂
GenAI Design Thinking Workshop
Helping participants break down their business processes to identify opportunities for adopting agentic AI workflows using the 5I framework.
Claude Code is for software developers, and OpenClaw is more for business users.
A learner said this to another learner during a recent workshop. I think this is the most common and most dangerous misconception about these two tools.
Claude Code can code nice UI. But nice UI doesn't mean good UI.
Manual UI testing is becoming one of my biggest bottlenecks when coding with AI now.
GenAI Design Thinking Workshop
Helping participants break down their business processes to identify opportunities for adopting agentic AI workflows using the 5I framework.
Advanced Tip: How to use Git history to improve AI agent skills
Building AI agent skills is the highest-value thing to learn with AI agents right now. Skills are what make an AI agent do your work, your way, instead of th...
I spent years looking for one book that lists the exhaustive set of science concepts applied in...
AI agent + skill is commoditizing (or democratizing for a better word) knowledge at a faster pace than many realized.
Gemini CLI stubbornly insisted its code was right and even did a Google search to prove it with an outdated article.
I was speechless. 😂